AIDBIPOC
Exhibit 3 · Packet 2
Dallas Police Department
Mailing Update · July 31, 2026

Mailing update — July 31, 2026: AIDBIPOC mailed formal packets to the Irving Police Department, Dallas Police Department, FBI Dallas Field Office, and the Texas Department of Public Safety Missing Persons Clearinghouse. USPS accepted all four packets on July 31, 2026.

The Irving, Dallas, and FBI packets were sent by Priority Mail with USPS Tracking. The Texas DPS Missing Persons Clearinghouse courtesy packet was sent by USPS Ground Advantage with tracking.

All four packets were delivered August 3, 2026, per USPS tracking. USPS acceptance and tracking records are retained by AIDBIPOC. The 10-business-day response period runs through Monday, August 17, 2026.

Dallas Jurisdiction Evidence Summary

Documented Evidence Occurring Within Dallas City Limits — In the Matter of Chalice Angel Welch

RE: Chalice Angel Welch — NamUs MP116308 · Missing since February 2–3, 2024. Prepared as Exhibit 3 to AIDBIPOC Formal Demand Letter to the Dallas Police Department, dated July 31, 2026.

This summary consolidates the documented evidence specific to the Dallas Police Department's jurisdictional responsibility in the disappearance of Chalice Angel Welch. Although the initial missing person report was filed with the Irving Police Department, the entirety of the post-event evidentiary trail — including the last confirmed sighting, the final GPS ping, and the confirmed destruction of the subject's mobile device — occurred within Dallas city limits.

I. Case Identification

Subject
Chalice Angel Welch · Age 24 at disappearance · Mother of four
Missing Since
February 2–3, 2024
NamUs ID
MP116308
Initial Report
Irving Police Department · Case #24-0002532
Duration Missing
over 29 months as of the date of this submission

II. Evidence Located Within Dallas City Limits

Each of the evidentiary elements below falls geographically within the Dallas Police Department's jurisdictional boundary. Taken together, they establish Dallas PD's standing to open an independent missing-persons investigation and to evaluate the case for CLEAR Alert activation.

Last Confirmed Sighting
3:58 AM, February 3, 2024 — Dallas, TX.
Luxia Midtown Park Airbnb, 8107 Manderville Lane, Apt. 1519, Dallas, TX.
Documented via on-site Airbnb surveillance footage.
Final Phone Ping
4:36 AM, February 3, 2024 — Dallas, TX.
Walnut Hill Lane & North Central Expressway, Dallas, TX — approximately one (1) mile from the Airbnb location.
Timing establishes post-surveillance movement: the subject's device was moved approximately one mile within a 38-minute window before being rendered inoperable.
Device Destruction
Deliberate phone destruction confirmed by carrier records — occurred within Dallas city limits.
The carrier has documented intentional tampering inconsistent with battery drain, disablement by the subject, or routine device failure.
Jurisdictional Conclusion: The complete post-incident evidentiary chain — surveillance, GPS, and physical device destruction — lies within the territorial jurisdiction of the Dallas Police Department. Irving PD's filing of the original missing person report does not transfer jurisdiction over investigative acts occurring outside Irving city limits.

III. Applicable Texas Statutory Authority

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 2A.051 — General Peace Officer Duties

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 2A.051 sets out general peace-officer duties, including preserving the peace within the officer's jurisdiction using lawful means and performing the other duties identified in that article. AIDBIPOC therefore requests that Dallas PD explain its jurisdictional assessment, whether the Dallas-located evidence was evaluated, and how it coordinated with Irving PD.

Texas Government Code § 411.462 — CLEAR Alert Activation

The Coordinated Law Enforcement Adult Rescue (CLEAR) Alert was established to notify the public of endangered adults when two threshold criteria are met: (1) a credible threat to the individual's health or safety exists, and (2) sufficient identifying information exists to justify issuance of an alert.

Based on the evidence documented in Section II above — last confirmed sighting within Dallas city limits, phone destruction one mile from that sighting, eyewitness accounts of incapacitation in the hours preceding, and the existence of trafficking-platform postings bearing the subject's likeness — AIDBIPOC requests that Dallas PD evaluate whether these documented facts satisfy both statutory criteria and, if a CLEAR Alert was not issued, provide a written explanation of the basis for that determination.

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 63.009(a)(3) and Art. 63.009(b) — NCIC Entry and Supplementation Requirements

Under Art. 63.009(a)(3), law enforcement agencies are required to enter missing person reports into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database not later than two hours after receiving a report. Under Art. 63.009(b), agencies are required to supplement the record with any additional information obtained after the initial report, including information that becomes available through subsequent investigation. AIDBIPOC requests confirmation that Dallas PD has complied with its duties under these provisions with respect to any records it holds related to Chalice Angel Welch, and that any evidence within Dallas PD's jurisdiction has been entered into or cross-referenced against the NCIC record.

IV. Federal Nexus

While the primary purpose of this exhibit is to establish Dallas PD's state-level jurisdictional authority, the documented evidence additionally crosses thresholds relevant to federal trafficking statutes. A parallel demand letter and corresponding exhibit are being submitted concurrently to the FBI Dallas Field Office under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 and § 2421. Dallas PD's coordination with federal partners is formally requested and documented as part of the overall advocacy record.

V. Finding & Formal Assertion

AIDBIPOC Formal Finding

Based on the documented evidence above, AIDBIPOC asserts that the documented facts provide a basis for the Dallas Police Department to (1) evaluate whether an independent missing-persons investigation is warranted under its jurisdictional authority, (2) confirm whether a CLEAR Alert evaluation was conducted and document the outcome of that evaluation, and (3) coordinate formally with Irving PD, the FBI Dallas Field Office, and the Texas Department of Public Safety to consolidate the investigative record.

The reported absence of a Dallas PD case opening and the absence of a documented CLEAR Alert evaluation raise questions about jurisdictional assessment and interagency coordination. AIDBIPOC therefore requests that Dallas PD explain whether the Dallas-located evidence was evaluated, how responsibility was coordinated with Irving PD, and whether CLEAR Alert eligibility was considered during the applicable historical window.

VI. Requested Dallas PD Response

AIDBIPOC respectfully requests that Dallas PD provide, within the ten (10) business day confirmed-receipt response window established in the attached demand letter:

(1) Written confirmation that an independent Dallas PD investigation has been opened, or a written explanation for the decision not to do so;

(2) A written statement addressing the CLEAR Alert evaluation, including which statutory criteria were found not to be met and on what evidentiary basis;

(3) Confirmation that the documented Dallas-jurisdiction evidence summarized in Section II above has been preserved and secured as part of any record the Department maintains related to this matter; and

(4) Confirmation of coordination status with Irving PD, the FBI Dallas Field Office, and the Texas Department of Public Safety.

Note on Sources: All evidentiary claims presented in this summary are drawn from the documented record referenced in AIDBIPOC's formal demand letter and its supporting Case Documentation Package (Exhibit 4). Claims identified as "confirmed by the carrier" or "documented via surveillance" refer to records as represented to AIDBIPOC by the subject's family and advocacy contacts and as referenced in ongoing case coverage. AIDBIPOC submits this summary in good faith as the sourced basis for its formal demands and welcomes the Department's independent verification of each element.

Help Keep Chalice's Case Visible

Review the documented record, add your name to the petition, and send verified information through the appropriate channel.

✍ Sign the Petition Submit a Tip View Case Profile Document Library Case Home